CEN4021: Software Engineering II  up ↑

Oral Communication Rubric

The ability of students to function effectively on teams will be assessed according to the following rubric. To pass the course, a rating of "Effective" or higher is expected.

 Highly EffectiveEffectiveIneffective
Organization
  • Structure
 Presentation well prepared and organized. Logical structure to presentation clearly evident and readily identifiable Organized structure is evident, but some inconsistency in allocation of content to structure. Logical structure of presentation difficult to identify for any reasonable viewer.
Content
  • Clarity
 Essence of presentation clearly conveyed and easily understood by reasonable viewers General idea of presentation topic conveyed, but lacks clarity or fails to identify significant features topic. Reasonable viewers would have difficulty in identifying essence and details of presentation.
  • Expertise
 Presenter demonstrates knowledge and familiarity sufficient to convince viewers of expert knowledge. Understanding of subject matter is evident, but presenter conveys some lack of expert knowledge. Failure to demonstrate expert knowledge. Failure to give viewersconvincing sense of expertise in the subject matter.
  • Quantity
 Sufficient content is presented for viewer to gain a clear understanding of presentation subject matter without extraneous information. Content lacks enough detail to satisfy inquiries of reasonable viewers. Extraneous or excessively detailed information presented. Content is insufficient to convey an understanding of the presentation to a reasonable viewer. Content is excessive so as to obscure understanding of subject matter
Delivery
  • Technical
 Presentation appears extemporaneous and conversational Presentation occasionally relies on notes. Presentation depends on frequent reference to notes and gives a strong perception of scripted material or is mechanical.
  • Technical
 Presentation is grammatically correct, with language and tone appropriate to subject matter and audience. Few grammatical errors. Some use of colloquialisms or language slightly inappropriate to subject matter and audience. Frequent grammatical errors. Inappropriate language or frequent use of colloquialisms or jargon. Poor mechanics in volume or verbalized pauses.
Notes









($id$)